The Study of Research Management Standards At Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta And University Utara Malaysia
Keywords:
research standards; research management; higher education governance; comparative study.Abstract
This study aims to examine: (1) the research management standards implemented at Yogyakarta State University and Universiti Utara Malaysia; (2) the extent to which these standards are realized in practice; and (3) the obstacles encountered in their implementation. The research employed a mixed-method approach using both quantitative and qualitative data within a comparative study design. Data were collected through document analysis, interviews, and institutional reports related to research management systems at both universities. The findings indicate that the research management standards at Yogyakarta State University and Universiti Utara Malaysia share similar frameworks, encompassing planning, organizing, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. In both institutions, research management is coordinated by university research institutes operating under the direct supervision of the Rector or Vice-Chancellor. The head of the research institution is responsible for overseeing research planning, execution, and evaluation processes. Despite structural similarities, differences were identified in resource allocation, administrative systems, and policy integration. Overall, effective research management requires strong institutional commitment, structured governance, and continuous evaluation to ensure research quality and productivity.
Downloads
References
Akpan, C. P. (2015). Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(9), 65–76. European Centre for Research Training and Development.
Bansal, R. K. (2014). Enhancing education and practice: Need for strengthening of internship (rotatory housemanship) training in India. Education for Health, 17(3), 332–338.
Carolin, R. (2014). “The best practices” in teaching and learning: Challenging current paradigms and redefining their role in education. The College Quarterly, 9(5), 8–19.
Hay McBer. (2018). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness (Research Report No. 216). The Crown Copyright Unit.
Ishikawa. (2016). Encountered projects in incubated technology-based companies. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 27(1), 120–134.
Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi guru profesional: Strategi meningkatkan kualifikasi dan kualitas guru di era global. Erlangga Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Gafur, Andik Eko Prasetyo Budi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
