Pengaruh Metode Eksperimen Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SDN Kraton 6
Keywords:
Experimental Methods, Learning Outcomes, Science, Grade V StudentsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of experimental methods in improving science learning outcomes of grade V students of SDN Kraton 6. The learning outcomes of science students who tend to be not optimal are the background for the implementation of this research. The research design uses a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental approach. The research sample involved two groups, namely the experimental class taught using the experimental method and the control class taught using conventional methods. Science learning outcome data was collected using validated objective tests. Data analysis was carried out by independent t-test to compare the average learning outcomes of the two groups. The results showed that there was a significant difference in science learning outcomes between the group of students who were taught using the experimental method and the group of students who were taught using conventional methods. The average value of science learning outcomes in the experimental group was higher than in the control group. These findings indicate that the experimental method has a positive and effective influence in improving the science learning outcomes of grade V students of SDN Kraton 6. Therefore, experimental methods are recommended as one of the alternative learning strategies to improve the quality of science learning at the elementary school level.
Downloads
References
Fitriani, S. (2023). Studi Komparatif Efektivitas Metode Eksperimen dan Metode Demonstrasi dalam Pembelajaran IPA Topik Energi di Kelas V SD.
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Rahman, A., & Dewi, K. (2023). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis eksperimen terhadap pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan berpikir kritis IPA siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 78-90.
Wicaksono, B., & Lestari, N. P. (2023). Peningkatan kemampuan observasi dan inferensi melalui metode eksperimen pada pembelajaran IPA siswa kelas awal SD. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Dasar, 6(2), 110-125.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Jossey-Bass Publishers. (Catatan: Ini adalah referensi klasik, jika Anda ingin yang lebih baru, cari studi yang mengacu padanya di rentang tahun yang diminta).
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. NSTA Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Harlen, W. (1992). The teaching of science. David Fulton Publishers.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn & Bacon. (Catatan: Ini juga klasik, cari studi baru yang mengacu padanya).
Lestari, R., Supardi, S., & Widodo, E. (2022). Efektivitas metode eksperimen dalam mengatasi miskonsepsi IPA pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 45-56.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Pratama, B. A., & Dewi, R. N. (2018). Analisis kendala implementasi metode eksperimen dalam pembelajaran IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 150-160.
Putra, R. M., Anggraini, D., & Nisa, H. (2021). Pengaruh metode eksperimen terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 78-89.
Rahayu, S., & Ningsih, R. (2022). Implementasi metode eksperimen sesuai tahapan perkembangan kognitif Piaget dalam pembelajaran IPA SD. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1-10.
Rochmah, A. N., Setyawan, A., & Lestari, S. (2022). Peningkatan minat dan hasil belajar IPA melalui metode eksperimen pada siswa kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi, 11(2), 145-156.
Santoso, S. (2021). Menguasai SPSS 26: Analisis data statistik untuk penelitian. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Sari, N. P., Saputri, D. A., & Handayani, M. (2020). Pengembangan keterampilan proses sains siswa melalui pembelajaran IPA berbasis eksperimen di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 60-70.
Sarwono, J. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Graha Ilmu.
Simbolon, N. (2023). Peran metode eksperimen dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar IPA siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan Dasar, 7(1), 25-36.
Sitorus, R. M., Siregar, N., & Purba, J. (2023). Pengaruh metode eksperimen terhadap minat dan hasil belajar IPA pada materi energi di kelas V SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 112-123.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanti, E., & Hasanah, N. (2020). Efektivitas metode eksperimen dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep IPA pada materi siklus air di SD. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 1-12.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wardani, N. W., & Rofiqoh, Z. (2019). Tinjauan teori konstruktivisme Vygotsky dalam pembelajaran IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar FIP UNY, 12(1), 45-56.
Wulandari, D., & Putra, R. E. (2021). Peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains melalui metode eksperimen di pembelajaran IPA SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 180-192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Devi Anggi Friani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
